This option is currently hard to make because of lack of information | Forum

Topic location: Forum home » General » General Chat
kidybera
kidybera Jul 25 '17
The LightSources Group is successfully providing uv lamp for radiation of harmful organisms in ship ballast water over a decade. Other methods use filtration, and chlorination, although scalping strategies may require dichlorination, and may be corrosive. UV radiation is proven very efficient for treating numerous microorganisms while leaving no harmful residual chemicals, and minimal maintenance. LightSources has partnered with a lot of the largest providers on the planet of ballast water treatment systems for ships by giving quality components for either new ship construction, or alterations to existing ships for being compliant.

The LightSources Group has facilities in the United States and Europe, offering expert solutions in designing the favorite choices system for your requirements, with quick turn-around some time to global distribution. We are continually conducting research and development to consider new strategies to improve our product and process, and they are proud to get pioneered proprietary LongLIfe™ technology in your Low Pressure (LP) Pellet Amalgam Lamps for UV germicidal applications. We can facts any bulb to match your system, with superior UV treatment that's most effective for germ killing solutions with a 254nm wavelength.

Tested in freshwater, brackish water and marine water. Salinity in ports and harbors around the globe vary significantly, making it necessary to test in most salinities, including freshwater. System suppliers that test in mere two salinities may obtain USCG type approval, however, comparable to issued AMS certificates, methods will only be allowed to operate in water salinities that had been tested and approved 800W uv lamp ballast. If a system is not tested in freshwater, it will not be permitted ballast in water.

The issue concerning limitations of BWTS is important, but particularly complicated as a result of lack of information from many equipment providers. It should be acknowledged that ALL BWTS have limitations. Typically, chemical systems (e.g. electro-chlorination) have limitations linked to the salinity in the water for being treated, its temperature or perhaps the amount of organic material contained therein, whereas UV-based BWTS have limitations regarding the UV-Transmission with the water to become treated. In other words, consequently all BWTS have special circumstances to which they cannot be anticipated to treat the river according to the IMO discharge standard. The trick for that ship owner then becomes to decide on a BWTS that may work under normal operational conditions. However, this options are currently tricky to make as a result of lack of information from makers of BWTS, and thus lack of transparency.
Share: